Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

DCIT, Circle 10 (1) , New Delhi Versus M/s GE Capital Business Process Management Services Pvt. Ltd.

Addition on account of license fee and Data service management charges - allowable business expenditure - AO treating the same as Capital expenditure as providing enduring benefit - Held that:- CIT(A) has held that as the facts for AY 2011-12 are similar to the facts of AY 2008- 09 and AY 2010-11, therefore, he held that his findings in the order passed for AY 2008-09 would stand equally applicable here and accordingly, in view of the same, the impugned payment on account of license fee and data .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

-9-2017 - SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Revenue : Sh. Vijay Verma, CIT(DR) For The Assessee : S h . Rohit Garg, Adv. ORDER PER H.S. SIDHU : JM The Revenue has filed this Appeal against the impugned Order dated 28.5.2015 of the Ld. CIT(A)-IV, New Delhi relevant to assessment year 2011-12. 2. The grounds raised in this Appeal read as under:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A)-4 has erred in deleting the addition of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2) of the Act alongwith questionnaire under section 142(1) was issued on 12.8.20132 and 30.10.2014. Due to change of incumbency AO issued notice u/s. 142(1) on 20.11.2014. In response to the notices, the assessee s AR attended the proceedings from time to time and filed the details. The assessee company is engaged in the business of providing business of process management services to credit card companies, in particular SBI Cards and Payment Services Private Limited in respect of payment produc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the said Vision Plus software program. During the assessment proceedings u/s. 143(3) of the Act, the AO was of the view that the license to this software provides enduring benefit to the assessee and therefore, held the payments and in pursuance of the EULA as capital in nature and therefore, disallowed license fee and data service management charges paid to GECC for use of Vision Plus software aggregating to ₹ 3,70,98,989/- and completed the assessment at ₹ 24,50,23,860/- u/s. 14 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the contrary, Ld. Counsel of the assessee has relied upon the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and stated he has passed a well reasoned order which does not need any interference. At the time of hearing, Ld. Counsel of the assessee stated that Ld. CIT(A) has deleted the addition in dispute by respectfully following the order of the Ld. CIT(A) for the assessment year 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2010-11. He further stated that the ITAT vide order dated 16.10.2015 passed in assessee s own case in ITA No. 2806/Del/ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd perused the relevant records, especially the impugned order. For the sake of convenience, we are reproducing herewith the relevant portion of the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A):- 6.3 Regarding Ground II of the appeal relating to treatment of license fee paid to GECC as capital in nature, I find that the same issue have been discussed in detail in the appellate order passed by me in the Appellant's case for AY 2008- 09 and AY 2010-11. While deciding on the appeals for these years, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s created, transactions are authorized, raising disputes, sending statements, customer services and online payments processing. The software is mainly for credit card transactions processing by multinational banks and transaction processing companies. Various banks and financial institutions use this application software to store and process credit card, debit card, prepaid closed end loan accounts and process financial transactions which is available off the shelf. I also find that GECC itself .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rovide any exclusive use to the Appellant. (ii). GECC is a global license holder of the vision plus software and the Appellant is one of the users of such software license which in itself implies that there is no 'exclusivity that the Appellant is entitled to. (iii) The EULA allows GECC to receive license fee from the Appellant on quarterly basis (refer in this regard clause 3.1 of the EULA). The agreement provides for periodic payment for use of software to GECC which has been subject matte .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e there is any "breach in material terms including on the periodical payments for user", i.e., if there is a default in payment, then the agreement and consequentially, the right of the Appellant to use the software stands terminated forthwith. (Refer in this regard clause 5.1 (a) of the EULA). (vi) Upon termination, the right to use the licensed program shall end and the Appellant is required to with immediate effect deliver the licensed program to GECC and the Appellant is required t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any irrevocable transfer of bundle of rights on it. On the other hand, the Appellant is bound by various conditions in respect of the manner of use of the license. Keeping in view the same, the Appellant Company's case gets squarely covered by the Hon'ble SC in the case of MIs Empire Jute Co. Ltd. (supra) and other cases cited by the Appellant in its defence, since no enduring benefit has been acquired by the Appellant through the payment of license fee for the limited use of the license .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ue in nature and allowable u/s 37 of the Act. Accordingly, this ground is allowed in favour of the Appellant. The alternative plea of the Appellant thus, become infructuous. 6.1. We further find that ITAT, C Bench, New Delhi vide its order dated 16.10.2015 passed in ITA No. 2806/Del/2011 (AY 2007-08) in the matter of assessee i.e. GE Capital Business Process Management Services Pvt. Ltd. and in ITA No. 2124/Del/2013 (AY 2008-09) in the case of ACIT vs. GE Capital Business Process Management Serv .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d circumstances of the case, the payment of license fee, connectivity charges and co-ordination charges amounting to ₹ 2,19,60,467/- made by the assessee to GECC(USA) under the end-user agreement shall fall within the category of capital expenditure or revenue expenditure? The stand of the assessee is that it is in the nature of revenue expenditure and deductible u/s. 37(1) of the Act whereas the ld. Authorities below have put it in the category of capital expenditure and disallowed the cl .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ranted by the licensor in itself is a capita asset, being intangible asset , which having long validity is capital in nature. We have gone through the End-User license agreement dated 07.07.2000 and we do not find substance in the conclusion arrived at by the ld. Authorities below. It is notable that in terms of clause 2.2 and 2.3, the assessee company is specifically restricted to make copies of the software and make it available to any other period. There is also a bar on the assessee for use .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

kes that it shall not; (a) make the licensed program or any part thereof available to any period other than its employees on a need to know basis; (b). copy the Licensed Program or any part thereof, other than for archival backup purposes; (c). use the Licensed Program for any purpose other than as permitted by clause 2.2 of license, sell or otherwise alienate the Licensed Program in any manner whatsoever; or (d). Duplicate, market, license or develop software programs that compete with the Lice .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

emoving the same from its systems on termination of agreement. Clause 5.5 of the agreement reads as under : 5.5. Upon termination of this Agreement the right to use the Licensed Program shall end and GECBPMS shall, with immediate effect : (a) deliver to GECC the Licensed Program; and (b) purge all copies of the licensed program stored in any CPU or other storage medium or facility, which for any reason cannot be delivered to GECC. In addition, an officer of GECBPMS shall certify in writing to GE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent to assume that the periodic payments made by the assessee were the installments for acquisition of such software and the payment was not for mere usage of software. It is a matter of fact on record that M/s. GECC (USA) itself has received the right to use the software internally including its group entities for its business and it does not have any right to commercially exploit the software. The assessee is vested with limited right to use the licensed program during the currency of license .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ring benefit for holding the same as capital in nature. The ld. DR has failed to rebut the contention of the assessee that the impugned software is an application software and is being used for accounting purposes. Such software are used by various banks and financial institutions. Moreover, the ld. CIT(A) in succeeding assessment years 2008-09, 2010-11 and 2011-12 has categorically gave finding of fact that the software is a application software which is routine in nature and used for accountin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ment, all the rights and title remained with GECC (USA). The ld. DR failed to dislodge the findings of the ld. CIT(A) given in the orders passed for subsequent years after considering the same license agreement and various decisions of Hon ble High courts and Supreme Court. It is also a matter of record that the assessee has returned its income for the relevant previous year at ₹ 152.88 crores whereas the amount expended towards use of routine application software is ₹ 2.19 croes whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icensor and the same cannot be made to use by the assessee in any manner. Similarly in the case of Jones Woodhead and Sons (India) (supra) relied on by the Assessing Officer is also distinguishable on facts inasmuch as in that case the agreement between the assessee and the foreign collaborator was in relation to setting up of a new business and the foreign collaborator besides furnishing information and technical know-how, rendered valuable assistance in setting up of the factory itself. No suc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icense fee, connectivity charges and co-ordination charges paid to US based company M/s. GE Capital Corporation for use of vision plus software holding the same as capital expenditure. This issue has been decided in favour of the assessee while deciding the appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2007-08 in the foregoing part of this order. There being no change in the facts and circumstances of the case and the disallowance being based on the same license agreement, we decide the issue i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Notification: Seeks to exempt goods imported for organising FIFA under 17, world cup, 2017

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: INELIGIBLE INPUT TAX CREDIT UNDER GST REGIME

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Article: All about E-way Bill under GST

Highlight: Provision for sick leave liability - based on the basis of notional figures - such notional liability cannot be allowed as deduction - section 43B(f) is not applicable.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version