Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Nulux Engineers Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax Ward-20 (2) , Mumbai And Vice-Versa

Disallowance of claim of deduction under section 80HHC of DEPB profit - Held that:- We find that this issue is clearly covered by the decision of Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs Kalpataru Colours and Chemicals (2010 (6) TMI 63 - BOMBAY HIGH COUR) and also followed by Mumbai Tribunal [2013 (8) TMI 1049 - ITAT MUMBAI] whereby Tribunal has directed the AO to recompute the deduction under section 80HHC of the Act in respect of DEPB profit in the light of judgement of Hon’ble Supreme .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

out of the different orders of CIT(A)-XX & CIT(A)-31, Mumbai, in appeal Nos. CIT(A)XX/IT-197/Addl.cit.20(2)/2005-06 & CIT(A)-31/IT-204/ACIT 20(20)/13-14 dated 27-12-2006 & 24-09-2014. The Assessments were framed by ACIT, Mumbai for the A.Ys. 2003-04 & 2002-03 vide orders dated 20-02-2006 & 30-08-2013 under section 143(3) and 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(hereinafter the Act ). 2. At the outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee stated that this appeal is time barred by 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he appeal was to be filed before Tribunal against this order on or before CIT(A) 28-02-2007. He stated that actually, the appeal was filed only on 22-03-2013 thereby this delay of filing in appeal by 2216 days. For this the learned Counsel for the assessee stated that following reasons for the delay: - 5. I say that although we had informed our tax consultant that Federation of Indian _Exports Association (of which we are also member) is contesting the retrospectivity on behalf of all the member .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Income Tax Appellant Tribunal being creature of the Act cannot decide the constitutional validity of such an amendment. He also opinioned that in view of aforesaid it is not advisable to litigate and he even opinioned that the argument that only "profit" is to be excluded and whole is against the assessee as is evident by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)'s order who has followed binding decision of Income Tax Appellant Tribunal. 6. I say that the argument on "profit&quo .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed assessment year, they have pointed out that as per Supreme Court decision in the case of Topman Exports Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2012) 67 DIR (SC) 185 the assessee firm would be eligible for deduction u/s 80NHC on the face value of DEPS which will be considered as "cash assistance" and would be taxable under section 28(iiib) and not u/s 28(iiid) of the Income Tax Act and hence the 3rd proviso to section SOHHC would not apply to such receipt. Based on this correct legal positi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

R 566 (Born) in which Mumbai High Court has held that the amendment in sec 80HHC relating to DEPB benefits deprives the benefit granted earlier to a class of assessee's and is accordingly violative for its retrospective operation. This decision was delivered on 16.08.2012. I say that these decisions of Supreme Court and High Court were not brought to our notice by anyone prior to February 2013. 9. I say that the firm relied on tax consultant's advice in taking a decision that due to retr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

firm decided to file appeal belated by 2214 days. I say and pray that the facts constitute "sufficient cause" for delay in filing appeal. 3. The learned Counsel for the assessee filed copy of Tribunal order of Kolkata Bench in the case of Magnum Exports Vs. ACIT in ITA No. 1111/Kol/2012 for the AY 2003-04 wherein facts are exactly identical. The delay of 2078 days was condoned exactly on identical circumstances. We find that exactly identical facts and circumstances are here in the pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

me Tax(Appeals) - XX (hereinafter referred to as CIT(A) has heard in considering benefit under Duty Entitlement Pass Book Scheme ('DEPB') a DEPB' instead of 'cash assistance' and accordingly applying the 3rd Proviso to section BOHHC of the Income Tax Act, as inserted by Taxation Laws (Amendments Acts) Act, 2005. 2. Without prejudice to ground no. 1, the appellant submits that Bombay High Court in the case of Vijay Silk House (Banglore) Limited vs. Union of India & Anr has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

has directed the AO to recompute the deduction under section 80HHC of the Act in respect of DEPB profit in the light of judgement of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Topman Exports (2012) 342 ITR 49 (Mum) by observing as under: - 4. We have perused the records and considered the matter carefully. The dispute is regarding allowability of claim of deduction in relation to DEPB income. The special bench of Tribunal in case of Topman Exports Ltd.(33 SOT 337) had earlier held that face value .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rofit u/s 28(iii d). However the Hon ble Supreme Court recently in case of Topman Exports Ltd. (Supra) have not upheld the view taken by the Hon ble High Court of Bombay and have confirmed the order passed by special bench of Tribunal on this issue, as per which the face value of DEPB has to be considered as income u/s 28 (iiib) and excess of sale price over the face value has to be considered as profit u/s 28(iii d). The deductor u/s 80HHC is, therefore, required to be computed accordingly. We, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities – Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version