Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Bhagwan Rishabnath Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Benefit of section 4BB of the Act - Held that:- The benefit of Sec 4BB is the statutory benefit and the assessees are entitled for the said benefit. To this effect, the Commissioner has already issued a circular No. 554 dated July 22, 2004 - similar issue covered by the case of AR. Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, UP. Lucknow [2009 (11) TMI 861 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT], where relying in the case of Diksha Suri v. ITAT [1997 (5) TMI 20 - DELHI High Court], Union of Ind .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed and hence as agreed and requested by learned counsel for the parties all these revisions are being decided by this common judgment. 2. It is stated at the Bar that questions of law raised in these revisions are squarely covered by judgment dated 13.11.2009 passed by this Court in the bunch of Trade Tax Revisions led by Trade Tax Revision No. 108 of 2008 (M/s A.R. Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Hardoi Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, U.P., Lucknow). The judgment of this Court reads as under: " .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ged in the manufacture and sale of rice. Each assessee was enjoying the eligibility certificate issued under Section 4-A of the Trade Tax Act for a particular period or tax rebate on the fixed capital investment as mentioned in the relevant certificate. The assessees have purchased the paddy as raw material and paid the tax. The assessees have claimed the set off of the tax already paid on the paddy as per Section 4-BB before getting the benefit in the computation to be made under Section 4-A of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ssed by the A.O. where he has denied / recalled the benefit already given pertaining to the tax paid on paddy. Not being satisfied, the assessees have knocked the door of this Court through the present revisions. With this background, Sri Pradeep Agarwal learned counsel for the revisionists submitted that each assessee has established a new units for making rice from paddy and applied the eligibility certificate which was granted under section 4-A of the Act. As per section 4-BB, the assessees w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he same was recalled. Being aggrieved, the assessees have filed the first appeal before the first appellate authority who has allowed the claim of the assessee. Not being satisfied, the department has filed an appeal before the Trade Tax Tribunal who vide its impugned order has allowed the appeals filed by the department and wrongly denied the benefit given by the first appellate authority. He further submitted that a Division Bench of the Tribunal has earlier decided a few appeals on merits in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tored. On the other hand, Sri Sanjai Sareen learned counsel for the Department has supported the impugned orders passed by the Tribunal. He submitted that the Tribunal has decided only the proceedings passed under Section 22 of the Trade Tax Act. I have heard both the parties at length and gone through the material available on record. From the record, it appears that the benefit of Section 4-BB of the Act is the statutory benefit and the assessees are entitled for the said benefit. To this effe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

395 Delhi 2. U.O.I. v. Paras Laminates (P) Ltd., 186 ITR 722 SC 3. CIT v. L. G. Ramamurthy, 110 ITR 453 Madras The coordinate Bench of the Tribunal must follow the earlier decision as per the ratio laid down in the case of C.I.T. v Travencore, 265 ITR 526 Kerala. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Honda Siel Power Products Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, 295 ITR 466 observed that rule of precedent was an important aspect of certainty in the rule of law, and prejudice had resulted t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

admit the fresh evidence, if need be, in the interest of justice. In the result, all the revisions filed by the assessees are allowed for statistical purposes." 3. Following aforesaid judgment another judgment was passed by this Court on 09.09.2014 in Trade Tax Revision No. 31 of 2009 (M/s H.B. Rice Mills Pvt. Ltd. Hardoi Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P. Commercial Tax Bhawan) with other connected matters wherein the short order passed by this Court reads as under: "Heard Sri P .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version