Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mita India Pvt. Ltd Versus Union of India & Another

2017 (9) TMI 764 - DELHI HIGH COURT

Request for inspection of public file with the Designated Authority (DA) - levy of anti dumping duty - delay in making request - Held that: - the Petitioner claims that the Petitioner became aware of the Notification dated 17th February 2017 only in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ty during the period of investigation was already in force for more than a year and was to the knowledge of the Petitioner. It appears to the Court that, having missed its opportunity of filing its appeal in the CESTAT within time, the Petitioner was .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

etitioner : Mr. Rajesh Sharma and Ms. Rita Jha, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Kirtiman Singh and Prateek Dhanda, Advocates ORDER 1. The Petitioner seeks a direction to the Designated Authority, Directorate General of Anti Dumping and Allied Dut .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

teel' (other than cast iron and stainless steel) whether hot finished or cold drawn or cold rolled of an external diameter not exceeding 355.6 or 14" OD" from China PR. 2. It appears that the Initiation Notification was issued on 8th Ju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ner before the Customs Excise, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ). 4. On 27th June 2017, the Petitioner addressed a letter to the DA stating that, for the purposes of filing an appeal before the CESTAT, it required the list of interested parti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ware of the Notification dated 17th February 2017 only in the second week of May, 2017 and therefore could not make the above request earlier. This explanation is not convincing. The Notification, having been gazzetted, is presumed to have been in th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version