Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Gopal Iron And Steel Co. (Guj) Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credit - source of money received in share applications etc - Held that:- In some of the cases, signature of the applicants in the bank slip differ with the application in the share application form. Many of the bank slips were signed by one person. Apparently, cash for 32 applicants was handed over by one person of the entire amount. The demand drafts were issued by Wadhwan city branch of the bank whereas the applicants were living at different places such as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rs were not genuine which finding the Tribunal has confirmed - Decided against the assessee. - TAX APPEAL NO. 650 of 2017 With TAX APPEAL NO. 651 of 2017 - Dated:- 12-9-2017 - MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. BIREN VAISHNAV, JJ. For The Appellant : MR VIJAY S RANJAN, ADVOCATE ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The original order of assessment passed by the Assessing Officer dated 23.3.1999 is taken on record. 2. These appeals involve similar questions in similar background involvin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

96-1997. The assessee company had filed return of income declaring a loss of ₹ 9,919/. The return was taken in scrutiny by the Assessing Officer who passed the order of assessment determining the total income of the assessee at ₹ 46.92 lakhs (rounded off) making addition of the same sum under section 68 of the Income Tax Act ( the Act fort short) on account of unexplained cash credit in the form of share application money. The assessee carried the matter in appeal. After one round of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

share applicant, their PAN, source of money received in share applications etc. The Assessing Officer noted that the assessee filed ITR acknowledgment of 18 parties which constituted share capital of ₹ 60,43,000/. For the remaining parties, confirmation of 26 parties involving share capital of ₹ 16,82,900/were filed without any details like identity, genuineness and credit worthiness of the share capital. The confirmation of such 26 parties were filed in common format. Regarding rem .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd drafts are as under : i) Cheques drawn on the Gujarat State Co.op bank ltd., Ahmedabad Sr. No. Name Cheque No. Date Amount 01 Ganapatbhai A. Patel 689702 5.5.95 25000 At Kherva, Tal. Patadi, 02 Vinodchand V. Patel 689703 5.5.95 25000 At Kherva, Tal. Patadi, 03 Bhurabhai G. Patel 689704 5.5.95 25000 At Kherva, Tal. Patadi, 04 Jivanbhai L. Patel 689705 5.5.95 25000 At Kherva, Tal. Patadi, 05 Hargovindbhai C. Patel 689706 5.5.95 25000 At Kherva, Tal. Patadi 06 Baldevbhai P. Patel 689707 5.5.95 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

15 5.5.95 25000 At Dudapur Vaya Gala, SNR 15 Jerambhai R. Patel 689716 5.5.95 25000 At Dudapur Vaya Gala, SNR 16 Lavjibhai D. Patel 689717 5.5.95 25000 At Dudapur Vaya Gala, SNR 17 Virajibhai Patel 689718 5.5.95 25000 At Nana Ankevaliya, 18 Ramaji K. Patel 689719 5.5.95 25000 At Nana Ankevaliya, 19 Chhaganbhai M. Patel 689720 5.5.95 25000 At Dudheraj, Wadhwan, SNR 20 Tribhuvan Patel 689721 5.5.95 25000 At Dudheraj, Wadhwan, SNR 21 Hargovindbhai C. Patel 689748 6.6.95 25000 At Kherva, Tal. Patadi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

774 28.6.95 25000 At Nana Ankevaliya,SNR 30 Prahladbhai M. Patel 689775 28.6.95 25000 At Nana Ankevaliya,SNR 31 Baldevbhai G. Patel 689776 28.6.95 25000 At Nana Ankevaliya,SNR 32 Hargovindbhai C. Patel 689777 28.6.95 25000 At Nana Ankevaliya,SNR Total 800000 State Bank of India Sr. No. Name Cheque No. Date Amount Address 01 Khumansingh Jumbhai Solanki 271459 19.1.96 49000 PO Hadala T.A. Limbdi Surendranagar 02 Hemubha Jembhai Solanki 271460 19.1.96 49000 PO Hadala Dist. A'bad Dhanduka 03 Bal .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

na 242754 12.12.95 15000 At Talodgam TA Pratij Dist. Himmatnagar 02 Chhaganbhai K Patel 242755 12.12.95 40000 At Talodgam TA Pratij Dist. Himmatnagar 03 Gangarambhai K Patel 242756 12.12.95 40000 At Talodgam TA Pratij Dist.SK 04 Ravjibhai N Patel 242757 12.12.95 45000 At. Vakrapur TA Pratij Dist SK 05 Dashrath N Raval 452984 20.10.95 17000 rf. Sr. 11 06 Ramasingh Magansingh Rathod 452985 20.10.95 15000 rf. Sr. 11 07 Dashrath N Raval 452986 20.10.95 8000 rf. Sr. 11 08 Dilipsingh J Makwana 452987 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ai Patel 958842 16.05.95 18000 refer Sr. 4 5 Bhagwatiben Patel 958844 16.05.95 10000 refer Sr. 4 6 Madhuben Patle 958845 16.05.95 10000 62, Poonamnagar Bhalan Rd. Surat 7 Manoharbhai Jada 958846 16.05.95 10000 AT & PO Amrali TA. 8 Manoharbhai M Patel 958847 16.05.95 15000 64, Rangnagar Soc. Dist Surat 9 Naranbhai Patel 958848 16.05.95 10000 123000 Enquiries were conducted with the Surendra Nagar Dist Coop Bank Ltd Wadhwan City Branch regarding 32 applicants photocopies of slips of demand dra .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s are signed by one person named Rameshbhai. Photocopies of these 12 share application forms and bank slipls for DD are enclosed annexed to the order. iv) In all the 32 applications, break up of cash is not given which indicates that one person has handed over total amount to the banker for taking drafts in different names. v) All the demand drafts are issued by Wadhwan city Bracnh of SNR Dist Co. Op Bank Ltd whereas the applicants are living in different places like Kherwa, Patdi, Nana Ankleshw .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sactions or not. a) 18 applicants applied for share capital of ₹ 6043000 for which confirmations and PA Nos are filed along with ITR acknowledgment are considered as genuine and correct. b) Confirmations of 26 parties of share capital of ₹ 1682900 are filed in common format without any corroborative evidences to prove genuineness and credit worthiness from which source applicant has made application. c) 145 applicants for share capital of ₹ 3010000 no confirmation and source of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icer has jurisdiction to make enquiries with regard to the nature and source of a sum credited in the books of account of the assessee and it is immaterial as to whether the amount so credited is given the colour of a loan or a sum representing sale proceeds or even receipt of share application money. The use of words any sum found credited in the books in section 68 indicates that the section is very widely worded and the Income Tax officer is not precluded from making any enquiry as to the tru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt of the company. Further assessee has not proved ingredients as decided by Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs. Precision Finance Pvt. Ltd (1994) 208 ITR 465. Therefore, it is clear that assessee has not discharged its onus to prove that share capital is genuine and correct. Subject to the above discussion, the unexplained credit in the form of share capital of ₹ 4692900 (1682900 + 3010000) are held as income chargeable to tax in the hands of the assessee company u/s. 68 of the IT .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector reg.

Forum: transfer of shares

Forum: Input tax credit

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version