Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (9) TMI 945

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .2003 - the appellant is liable to duty of their activities in respect of three products from that date. Classification of goods - emblem radiator grill, cap assembly oil filter, audio players with or without speakers, bulbs, switches, fuses and relays - Revenue classified these items under Chapter 39 and 85 - deemed manufacture - Held that: - audio players with or without speakers, radio assemblies are sound reproducing equipments which are specifically to be under the classification of Tariff Entry 8527 as per the clarificatory note of HSN applicable at the relevant time. As such, following the clarificatory note of HSN, we find the product is rightly classifiable under Chapter 85 and is subjected to levy of duty in terms of the above Schedule r/w section 2(f)(iii) for the period after 1.3.2003 - Considering that these are items are designed for manufacture for use in automobile industry and same was recorded by the original authority also in more than one place of the impugned order, we find no justification to call these items as generic articles of plastic when they are admittedly principally and solely usable in the automobiles. As such, the duty liability in terms of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... demand and recover central excise duty not paid on such activities on various items claimed to be components, spares of automobile. The period of dispute is 1.6.2002 to 31.5.2006. The original authority on completion of adjudication, held that the appellant is liable to pay central excise duty of ₹ 2,04,76,495/- and also imposed penalty of equal amount under section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. 3. The ld. counsel for the appellants submitted that the dispute relates mainly on lubricating oil, adhesive kits, coolants, emblem radiator grill and cap assembly oil filter, audio players with or without speakers and radio assembly, bulbs, switches, fuses and relays. He summarized the position of the appellant as below:- Product Classification as Per Department Assessees contention 1.6.2002 to 28.2.2003 1.3.2003 to 31.5.2006 Lubricating Oil 2710 Demand under S. 2(f)(ii) Chapter Note not attracted Demand under section 2(f)(iii) Part or accessories of automobiles and hence classifiable under 8708. Hence no deemed manufacture till 1. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng the ratio laid down by the Hon ble Supreme Court. The general principles of interpretation as laid down by the Hon ble Supreme Court is squarely applicable to the present case also. 6. The ld. counsel contested the demand on limitation and also for imposition of equal amount penalty. He submitted that as could be seen from the proceedings, the whole issue is relating to interpretation of deemed manufacture as admittedly, the appellants are not involved in regular manufacture of these items. Further, the dispute involving classification with an implication on manufacture and the existence of PDC with the nature of activities carried down by the appellants are well within the knowledge of the department and there is no question of invoking suppression, willful mis-statement etc. in this case. He submitted that the original authority did not substantiate the allegation for confirmation of extended period. 7. The ld. AR contested the appeal on various grounds. He submitted that Section Note 2 to Section XVI is very clear to the effect that parts which are goods specifically covered under the said Chapters of the said Sections are to be classified in respect of Headings only. H .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s of relabeling or bulk to retail pack. The appellant would not be put to duty liability based on these Chapter Notes r/w section 2(f)(ii). In respect of these items, upto the period 1.3.2003. We note that lubricating oils, adhesive kits, coolants etc. will be covered under Schedule III which figures the respective entries finding place in the said Schedule which is applicable with effect from 1.3.2003. As such, we hold that the appellant is liable to duty of their activities in respect of three products from that date. 10. The next point of dispute is relating to emblem radiator grill, cap assembly oil filter, audio players with or without speakers, bulbs, switches, fuses and relays. The Revenue classified these items under Chapter 39 and 85 and demanded duty from the appellant on the ground that they are liable to discharge duty as a manufacturer with effect from 1.3.2003 in terms of Schedule III r/w section 2(f)(iii). The appellant contended that they are liable to duty only with effect from 1.6.2006 after the introduction of Sl.No. 100 in the said Schedule and not prior to that date. As such, the whole issue boils down to classification of these products and thereafter the c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ly designed for use in automobiles. This much has been admitted. However, Revenue intended to classify under 8536/8539. The decision of the Tribunal in Perfect Electric Concern Pvt. Ltd. (supra) dealt with classification of wind screen wipers, head lamps of all kinds and classify the same under Heading 8512 and switches and starting switches, changeover switches for electric vehicles were classified under Heading 85.36. We note that the appellant relied on GS Auto International Ltd. (supra) and also contended that they did not deal with heading 8512. We have perused the Apex Court decision in G.S. Auto International Ltd. (supra). The Apex Court observed as below:- 15. The question that needs to be adverted to is: whether the goods in question can appropriately be classified under Tariff Item 52 or not having been specified elsewhere, they fall under Tariff Item 68. In construing these items, what is the proper test to be applied Is it the functional test or is it commercial identity test which would determine the issue. It seems to us that this question is no longer res integra. It fell for consideration of this Court earlier and it was laid down that the true test for classi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntroduction of Sl. 100 in Schedule III of the Central Excise Act r/w section 2(f)(iii) of the Act with effect from 1.6.2006. There is no positive reason or duty demand prior to that date. 14. Having decided on the merits of the issue, as per our discussion above, we now take up the contention of the appellant on limitation. We note that the original authority recorded that the existence of PDC and the activities in the PDC are intimated to the department who are aware. However, he contended that the activities amounting to manufacture is not in the knowledge of the department. The appellant should have paid duty and fraudulently not declared the activity as manufacturer and evaded duty. We note that the whole issue as discussed elaborately by us herein above, is involving interpretation regarding application of the concept of deemed manufacture , for the activities undertaken in PDC by the appellant, admittedly, there is no normal or regular manufacture as defined under section 2(f). For attracting provisions of Chapter Notes or Schedule III to Central Excise Act, the question is one of interpretation as discussed by us herein above. 15. The original authority has recorded hi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates