TMI Blog2017 (10) TMI 218X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... possible e-mail ID of the accused. If e-mail ID is available with the Bank where the accused has an account, such Bank, on being required, should furnish such e-mail ID to the payee of the cheque. In every summons, issued to the accused, it may be indicated that if the accused deposits the specified amount, which should be assessed by the Court having regard to the cheque amount and interest/cost, by a specified date, the accused need not appear unless required and proceedings may be closed subject to any valid objection of the complainant. If the accused complies with such summons and informs the Court and the complainant by e-mail, the Court can ascertain the objection, if any, of the complainant and close the proceedings unless it becomes necessary to proceed with the case. In such a situation, the accused’s presence can be required, unless the presence is otherwise exempted subject to such conditions as may be considered appropriate. The accused, who wants to contest the case, must be required to disclose specific defence for such contest. It is open to the Court to ask specific questions to the accused at that stage. In case the trial is to proceed, it will be open to the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3. Few Facts: The Respondent Kanchan Mehta filed complaint dated 15th July, 2016 alleging that the appellants were to pay a monthly amount to her under an agreement. Cheque dated 31st March, 2016 was given for ₹ 29,319/- in discharge of legal liability but the same was returned unpaid for want of sufficient funds. In spite of service of legal notice, the amount having not been paid, the appellants committed the offence under Section 138 of the Act. The Magistrate vide order dated 24th August, 2016, after considering the complaint and the preliminary evidence, summoned the appellants. The Magistrate in the order dated 9th November, 2016 observed that the case could not be tried summarily as sentence of more than one year may have to be passed and be tried as summons case. Notice of accusation dated 9th November, 2016 was served under Section 251 Cr.P.C. 4. Appellant No.2, who is the Director of appellant No.1, made a statement that he was ready to make the payment of the cheque amount. However, the complainant declined to accept the demand draft. The case was adjourned for evidence. The appellants filed an application under Section 147 of the Act on 12th January, 2017 r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ( 2010 ) 11 SCC 441 . The object of the provision was described as both punitive as well as compensatory. The intention of the provision was to ensure that the complainant received the amount of cheque by way of compensation. Though proceedings under Section 138 could not be treated as civil suits for recovery, the scheme of the provision, providing for punishment with imprisonment or with fine which could extend to twice the amount of the cheque or to the both, made the intention of law clear. The complainant could be given not only the cheque amount but double the amount so as to cover interest and costs. Section 357(1)(b) of the Cr. P.C. provides for payment of compensation for the loss caused by the offence out of the fine R . Vijayan v . Baby ( 2012 ) 1 SCC 260 . Where fine is not imposed, compensation can be awarded under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. to the person who suffered loss. Sentence in default can also be imposed. The object of the provision is not merely penal but to make the accused honour the negotiable instruments Lafarge Aggregates Concrete India ( P ) Ltd . v . Sukarsh Azad ( 2014 ) 13 SCC 779 . 8. In view of the above s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sentence of more than one year may have to be passed. Even in such cases, the procedure to be followed may not be exactly the same as in Cr.P.C. The expression as far as possible in Section 143 leaves sufficient flexibility for the Magistrate so as not to affect the quick flow of the trial process. The trial has to proceed on day to day basis with endeavour to conclude the same within six months. Affidavit of the complainant can be read as evidence. Bank s slip or memo of cheque dishonour can give rise to the presumption of dishonour of the cheque, unless and until that fact was disproved. 10. Again, this Court considered the matter in J.V. Baharuni and Anr. etc. versus State of Gujarat and Anr etc. ( 2014 ) 10 SCC 494 and observed that the procedure prescribed for cases under Section 138 of the Act was flexible and applicability of Section 326(3) of the Cr.P.C. in not acting on the evidence already recorded in a summary trial did not strictly apply to the scheme of Section 143 of the Act Para 43 of J . V . Baharuni ( 2014 ) 10 SCC 494 . This Court observed that the procedure being followed by the Magistrates was not commensurate with the summary tri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... deviation as may be necessary for speedy trial in the context. 12. The sentence prescribed under Section 138 of the Act is upto two years or with fine which may extend to twice the amount or with both. What needs to be noted is the fact that power under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. to direct payment of compensation is in addition to the said prescribed sentence, if sentence of fine is not imposed. The amount of compensation can be fixed having regard to the extent of loss suffered by the action of the accused as assessed by the Court. The direction to pay compensation can be enforced by default sentence under Section 64 IPC and by recovery procedure prescribed under Section 431 Cr.P.C. Hari Kishan v . Sukhbir Singh ( 1988 ) 4 SCC 551; Suganthi Suresh Kumar v . Jagdeeshan ( 2002 ) 2 SCC 420; K . A . Abbas H . S . A . v . Sabu Joseph ( 2010 ) 6 SCC 230; R . Mohan v . A . K . Vijaya Kumar ( 2012 ) 8 SCC 721; and Kumaran v . State of Kerala ( 2017 ) 7 SCC 471 13. This Court in Indian Bank Association and Ors. versus Union of India and Ors. ( 2014 ) 5 SCC 590 approved the directions of the Bombay High Cour ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n of the complainant must be conducted within three months of assigning the case. The court has option of accepting affidavits of the witnesses instead of examining them in the court. The witnesses to the complaint and the accused must be available for cross-examination as and when there is direction to this effect by the court. 24. We, therefore, direct all the criminal courts in the country dealing with Section 138 cases to follow the abovementioned procedures for speedy and expeditious disposal of cases falling under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of, as above. 14. We may, however, note that this Court held that general directions ought not to be issued which may deprive the Magistrate to exercise power under Section 205 Cr.P.C. TGN Kumar v . State of Kerala ( 2011 ) 2 SCC 772 . We need to clarify that the judgment of this Court is not a bar to issue directions which do not affect the exercise of power under Section 205, to require personal attendance wherever necessary. Needless to say that the judgment cannot be read as affecting the power of the High Court under Article 225 of the Constituti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not be required to appear if the court is satisfied that the payment has not been duly made and if the complainant has no valid objection. If the accused is required to appear, his statement ought to be recorded forthwith and the case fixed for defence evidence, unless complaintant s witnesses are recalled for examination. 17. Having regard to magnitude of challenge posed by cases filed under Section 138 of the Act, which constitute about 20% of the total number of cases filed in the Courts (as per 213th Report of the Law Commission) and earlier directions of this Court in this regard, it appears to be necessary that the situation is reviewed by the High Courts and updated directions are issued. Interactions, action plans and monitoring are continuing steps mandated by Articles 39A and 21 of the Constitution to achieve the goal of access to justice Hussain vs . Union of India ( 2017 ) 5 SCC 702 . Use of modern technology needs to be considered not only for paperless courts but also to reduce overcrowding of courts. There appears to be need to consider categories of cases which can be partly or entirely concluded online without physical presence of the parties by sim ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ering the further fact that apart from the sentence of imprisonment, the Court has jurisdiction under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C. to award suitable compensation with default sentence under Section 64 IPC and with further powers of recovery under Section 431 Cr.P.C. With this approach, prison sentence of more than one year may not be required in all cases. v) Since evidence of the complaint can be given on affidavit, subject to the Court summoning the person giving affidavit and examining him and the bank s slip being prima facie evidence of the dishonor of cheque, it is unnecessary for the Magistrate to record any further preliminary evidence. Such affidavit evidence can be read as evidence at all stages of trial or other proceedings. The manner of examination of the person giving affidavit can be as per Section 264 Cr.P.C. The scheme is to follow summary procedure except where exercise of power under second proviso to Section 143 becomes necessary, where sentence of one year may have to be awarded and compensation under Section 357(3) is considered inadequate, having regard to the amount of the cheque, the financial capacity and the conduct of the accused or any other circumstances. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
