Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. DSE Financial Services Ltd. Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India

2012 (9) TMI 1114 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

Appeal No. 153 of 2012 - Dated:- 11-9-2012 - P. K. Malhotra, Member & Presiding Officer (Offg.) S. S. N. Moorthy, Member, JJ. Mr. Shambhu Nath Singh, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Prateek Seksaria, Advocate with Mr. Mobin Shaikh, Advocate for t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Limited, Bombay Stock Exchange Limited and also as a depository participant of Central Depository Services (India) Limited. 2. The Board carried out inspection of the appellant during February 8-23, 2007 with regard to its activities as a stock brok .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nd Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, The Depositories Act, 1996 and the rules and regulations framed thereunder with regard to maintenance of its records. After affording an opportunity of hearing, th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ounsel for the parties for some time who have taken us through the record. We have specifically looked into the observations made by the adjudicating officer in para 206 of his order which reads as under: In respect of the said submissions of the Not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e unlawful gains made by the Noticee or the loss suffered by the investors. Further, the available details do not suggest that the Noticee had indulged repetitively in such violations/noncompliances. I have noted that the violations committed by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ted vs. SEBI Appeal no. 23 of 2011 decided on 16.6.2011), we have observed that it must be remembered that the purpose of carrying out inspection is not punitive and the object is to make the intermediary comply with the procedural requirements in re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version