Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Mr. Praveen Shankaralyam Versus M/s Elan Professional Appliances Private Limited and Others

2017 (1) TMI 1475 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

Petition barred by limitation in view of Section 433 of the Companies Act 2013 read with Article 113 of the Limitation Act 1963 - Held that:- Section 433 of Companies Act 2013 will not be applicable to the old cases, the appellant/ petitioner before .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

use of action taken place thereafter. The appellant has not explained the delay in filing the Company Petition though there is delay of more than five years. - As appellant submitted that the dividends are not paid in time, which are forwarded to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he address for service on appellant, as set out is - D-3/ 1 1, South Star Apartments, Gandhi Nagar Behind KSRTC Bus Stand, Ernakulum-20. - For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to entertain this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismisse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ll cause of action had taken place by 31st December 2010. The Company Petition was filed after more than five years in September 2015 and refiled in January 2016. The National Company Law Tribunal ("Tribunal" for short) Principal Bench, New .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hat Company Petition having filed under the provisions of Section 397, 398 and 402 Of the Companies Act 1956, the provision of Section 433 of the Act 2013 or application of Limitation Act 1963, which have come into force since 1st June 2016 will not .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d laches in preferring the Company petition as raised by the respondents. The appellant was removed as Director as back as on 31st December 2010 after notice to the appellant. There is no subsequent cause of action taken place thereafter. The appella .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version