Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (12) TMI 377

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... start from the date of knowledge of assessee by due communication by the competent authorities. The relevant date should be taken from the date of communication of the order to the appellant-assessee - the matter is remanded to the original authority to decide the issue of refund on merit, including question to undue enrichment, if any - appeal allowed by way of remand. - Excise Appeal No.55 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l, after hearing Sh. S. S. Sinha, ld. Advocate for the appellant and Sh. R.K. Misha, ld. AR for the Revenue. 4. The appeal is against order dated 25.08.2014 of Commissioner (Appeals-I), Raipur. The appellants preferred a refund claim for ₹ 60,40,906/- towards excess excise duty and the same was rejected on the ground of time bar. 5. Ld. Counsel appearing for the appellant submitted tha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Section 11B, Explanation (B) (eb) of the Act. The relevant date in case of provisional assessment is mentioned as the date of adjustment of duty after the final assessment. The lower authorities held that the date of order for finalisation should be taken for computing the limitation. Ld. Counsel contested the above finding on the ground that they could prefer a claim only when they come to kno .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ar that any order or finding of implication of duty liability has to be communicated to the assessee. All limitations will start from the date of knowledge of assessee by due communication by the competent authorities. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Vs. M.M. Rubber Co. - 1991 (55) ELT 289 (SC) held that it is uniformly laid down as a rule of law that for seeking the remedy, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion of the order to the appellant-assessee. As such, we find no merit in the impugned order recording a finding against the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside the matter is remanded to the original authority to decide the issue of refund on merit, including question to undue enrichment, if any. 9. The appeal is allowed by way of remand. (Dictated and pronounced in the o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates