Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Micro Inks Ltd & 1 Versus Union Of India Through Secretary & 2.

2013 (6) TMI 845 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Special Civil Application No. 8204 of 2011 - Dated:- 19-6-2013 - Mr. M.R. Shah And Ms. Sonia Gokani, JJ. Mr Mihir Joshi And Mr Dhaval Shah for the Petitioners Mr PS Champaneri And Mr RJ Oza, for the Respondent. ORAL ORDER Mr. M.R. Shah By way of this .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hich, on an application submitted by the petitioners to dispense with the predeposit against the total tax liability of ₹ 33,14,22,924/= plus equal amount of penalty and interest, the Tribunal has directed the petitioners to deposit an amount o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the appeal pending before the Tribunal. Today, when the present Special Civil Application is taken up for further hearing, Shri Mihir Joshi, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners has requested to consider reduction in the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

recovered a sum of ₹ 34 lakhs during the intervening period. He has stated at the bar that the amount of predeposit is ultimately left to the Court. Shri RJ Oza, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the Department has also stated at t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

oners has also stated at the bar that the petitioners also do not invite any further reasoned order, while directing the petitioners to pay the amount as predeposit, which is left to the discretion of the Court. In view of the broad consensus recorde .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to be decided by the Tribunal on merits. In view of the above and in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, without citing the same as a precedent, the impugned order dated 7th April 2011 passed by the Tribunal directing the petitioners t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version