Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (1) TMI 547

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t observed, Had the intention of Parliament being really to restrict the benefit (of unlimited carry forward prospectively), there were more decisive ways of doing so-such as, an expressed provision or an exception or proviso etc. The absence of any such legislative devise meant that provisions had to be construed in its own term and not so as to restrict the benefit or advantage, it sought to confirm. The reasoning in Motor & General Finance Ltd. (supra) does not call for reexamination. - ITA 1031/2017 - - - Dated:- 9-1-2018 - MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. A. K. CHAWLA JJ. Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel. Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sumit Lalchandani and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocates. MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) CM APPL. 42239/2017 (for condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in refiling the present appeal is hereby condoned. CM stands disposed of. ITA 1031/2017 2. The question of law urged by the Revenue in the appeal is whether the interpretation of Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( the Act ) as amended by Finance Act, 2001, could be given effect to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the allowance for depreciation for the following previous year and deemed to be part of that allowance, or if there is no such allowance for that previous year, be deemed to be the allowance for that previous year, and so on for the succeeding previous years. 8. Prior to its amendment, the provision had limited the carry forward of depreciation to 8 years. This restriction was brought in, by Finance Act, 1996. Prior to that amendment, there was no restriction or cap in the carrying forward of depreciation. In General Motors India Pvt. Ltd. (supra), the entire history of the legislation was considered by the Gujarat High Court including the reasons for the Finance Act No.2 of 1996, the amendment of 2001-brought into force with effect from 01.04.20002 as well as the circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (Circular No.14 of 2001). The Gujarat High Court, after considering and noticing these relevant facts, observed as follows:- 34. We may now examine the provisions of section 32(2) of the Act before its amendment by the Finance Act, 2001. The section, prior to its amendment by the Finance Act, 2001, read as under: Where in the assessment of the assessee full ef .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntroduced by the Finance (No. 2) Act was clarified by the Finance Minister to be applicable with prospective effect. 36. Section 32(2) of the Act was amended by the Finance Act, 2001, and the provision so amended reads as under: Where, in the assessment of the assessee, full effect cannot be given to any allowance under sub-section (1) in any previous year, owing to there being no profits or gains chargeable for that previous year, or owing to the profits or gains chargeable being less than the allowance, then, subject to the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 72 and sub-section (3) of section 73, the allowance or the part of the allowance to which effect has not been given, as the case may be, shall be added to the amount of the allowance for depreciation for the following previous year and deemed to be part of that allowance, or if there is no such allowance for that previous year, be deemed to be the allowance of that previous year, and so on for the succeeding previous years. 37. The purpose of this amendment has been clarified by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in Circular No. 14 of 2001 (see [2001] 252 ITR (St.) 65, 90). The relevant portion of the sa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... section 32(2) of the Act, a purposive and harmonious interpretation has to be taken. While construing the taxing statutes, rule of strict interpretation has to be applied, giving fair and reasonable construction to the language of the section without leaning to the side of the assessee or the Revenue. But if the Legislature fails to express clearly and the assessee becomes entitled for a benefit within the ambit of the section by the clear words used in the section, the benefit accruing to the assessee cannot be denied. However, Circular No. 14 of 2001 had clarified that under section 32(2), in computing the profits and gains of business or profession for any previous year, deduction of depreciation under section 32 shall be mandatory. Therefore, the provisions of section 32(2) as amended by the Finance Act, 2001, would allow the unabsorbed depreciation allowance available in the assessment years 1997 98, 1999 2000, 2000 01 and 2001 02 to be carried forward to the succeeding years, and if any unabsorbed depreciation or part thereof could not be set off till the assessment year 2002 03 then it would be carried forward till the time it is set off against the profits and gains of sub .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates