Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (1) TMI 722

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e absence of any sustainable evidence there is no justification for re-classifying the product and also to reject the declared value. Appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - Customs Appeal No.51645 of 2017 - A/50103/2018-CU[DB] - Dated:- 12-1-2018 - Shri Dr. Satish Chandra, President And Shri B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical) Shri H.C. Saini, Authorized Representative (DR) - for the appellant Shri S.N. Panda, Advocate for the respondent ORDER Per. B. Ravichandran This appeal is by Revenue against order dated 12/07/2017 of Commissioner (Appeals), New Custom House, New Delhi. The respondent filed a bill of entry for clearance of imported goods declared as outer RIM part of tractor trolley . The decla .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the imported goods, he held that before relying on NIDB data, parameters like nature, quality, level of import, time of import etc. are to be looked into before loading the value based on contemporaneous import of similar or identical goods. There is no reason recorded by the Original Authority for rejecting the transaction value. After relying on various decided case laws, the Appellate Authority held that there is no legal basis to re-determine the assessable value and accordingly, set aside the impugned order both on classification as well as valuation. Aggrieved by this order, the Revenue filed the present appeal. 3. The learned AR elaborating the grounds of appeal relied on Rule 2 (a) of General Interpretative Rules of Customs Tarif .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ing, of a size 7.5 x 20. The respondent neither imported complete wheel nor the size of the imported goods are in the diameter of 16 x 20 . The Department never adduced any evidence for change in the classification as well as to reject/re-determine the assessable value. 5. We have heard both the sides and perused the appeal record. We note that the original order was silent on various crucial aspects. This was pointed out in the impugned order. We note that the goods imported were commercially known and declared in the invoice as tractor trolley parts under Heading 8716. The principal use asserted for such Rim and disk is with the tractor trolley used mainly for agriculture related activities. The Original Authority relying on a state .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates