2018 (1) TMI 1265

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ned that the petitioner is adopting dilatory tactics and rejected the petition - Considering the fact that the writ petition is pending from the year 2006 onwards and there is an order of interim stay, this Court is inclined to remand the matter back to Settlement Commission for fresh consideration - petition allowed by way of remand. - W.P. No. 19210 of 2006 and M.P. No. 2 of 2006 - - - Dated:- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... efit if given, would bring down the duty liability to ₹ 16,69,953/-. 3. However, it appears that the petitioners did not avail the opportunity before the Commission and therefore, the Commission opined that the petitioner is adopting dilatory tactics and rejected the petition. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the out of the duty liability, the peti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X