Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Rhodia Specialty Chemicals India Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad

2018 (2) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI

CENVAT credit - marine insurance service - insurance for directors and supervisory officers arising in day-to-day functioning - Held that: - it is only a clerical error as no reason has been recorded for disallowing the credit of insurance for direct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

E/85068/17-Mum, E/CO/91028/17-Mum - A/91710/2017 - Dated:- 29-12-2017 - Mr. Raju, Member (Technical) Ms. Mansi Patil, Advocate, for appellant Shri S.J. Sahu, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for respondent ORDER This appeal has been filed by M/s. Rhodia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s arising in day-to-day functioning. The period of dispute is after 1.4.2012. Learned counsel pointed out that insofar as item No.1 is concerned, in para 8.1 of the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the cenvat credit in this re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

contradiction in the order. She pointed out that no reasons have been granted for holding it ineligible while there are reasons recorded in the order for holding it admissible. 2.1 Learned counsel further argued that the appellant is entitled to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Tribunal in the case of JSW Salav (Steel) Ltd. - 2015-TIOL-674-CESTAT-MUM, where insurance policies in respect of tugs and barges was held inadmissible. She argued that in the instant case there are no tugs and barges involved. She has relied .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on the impugned order. 4. I have gone through the rival submissions. In find that the impugned order in para 8.1 clearly holds that the credit of insurance for directors and supervisory officers liability is admissible relying on the decision of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Share:            

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version