2017 (10) TMI 1296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd not to semi-finished goods - Besides, the incident of fire took place in the month of August, 2007, hence, it is covered by the decision of of Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of C.C.E. & Cus , Ahmedabad II vs. Intas Pharmaceutcals Limited. [2013 (4) TMI 532 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT], where it was held that for input credited earlier, there is no scope of reversal of the credit if the finishe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Ld. Advocate for the Appellant submits that the remission from duty as prescribed under Rule 21 of CER, 2002 is applicable to finished goods and not to semi-finished goods. Besides, the incident of fire took place in the month of August, 2007, hence, it is covered by the decision of of Honble Gujarat High Court in the case of C.C.E. Cus , Ahmedabad II vs. Intas Pharmaceutcals Limited. 2013 ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X