TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 646X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the petitioners mutatis mutandis. The petitioners will, however, take steps both in consonance with the provisions of Section 248 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 and under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 within a period of ten (10) days from today. In order to facilitate this exercise, operation of the impugned list, insofar as it concerns the petitioners, will remain stayed till 31. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e which arises for consideration in this case is covered by the judgment of another Single Judge of this Court dated 21.12.2017, passed in W.P.(C)11381/2017, titled: Sandeep Singh Anr. v. Registrar of Companies Ors. This aspect is not disputed by the counsel for the respondents. Therefore, waiting for a counter affidavit would serve no purpose as the stand of the respondents is the same as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sonance with the directives contained in Sandeep Singh (supra). 5. Furthermore, counsel for the petitioners says that the petitioners would also like to avail the benefit of the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018. 6. Having regard to the assertions made in the petition and the records which are presently available with me, I am of the view that this petition can be disposed of with the dire ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
