Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Category of Documents

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
Highlights
D. Forum
What's New

Share:      

        Home        
 

TMI Blog

Home List
← Previous Next →

2018 (4) TMI 593

ce of the goods to their own unit? - Rule 3(4) of CCR. - Held that: - the appellant was required to pay the duty on removal of inputs as such, only equal to the amount of CENVAT Credit availed on such inputs - There is no dispute that the appellant have paid the excise duty on the removal of input as such to their own unit equal to the CENVAT Credit availed on such inputs - duty was not requir .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

ant submits that during the relevant period as per Rule 3(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, the amount of duty payable is only equivalent to the CENVAT Credit availed on inputs, therefore, the duty was not required to be paid in terms of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of price of excisable goods) Rules, 2000 as alleged by the Revenue. There is no dispute that the appellant have .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

w of the above rule, the appellant was required to pay the duty on removal of inputs as such, only equal to the amount of CENVAT Credit availed on such inputs. There is no dispute that the appellant have paid the excise duty on the removal of input as such to their own unit equal to the CENVAT Credit availed on such inputs. Therefore, we do not agree with the Revenue's contention that the duty .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map ||