Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (4) TMI 773

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he courts below that the right of Possession and/or effective control of the furniture/ equipment was not given by the respondent to its customers. Thus, the essential facts for levy of Service Tax under the category of "Supply of Tangible Goods" are wanting. Appeal dismissed - decided against Revenue. - ST/70071/2017-ST[SM] - Final Order 70572/2018 - Dated:- 14-3-2018 - Mr. Anil Choudhary, Member (Judicial) Shri Gyanendra Kumar Tripathi, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for Appellant Shri M. B. Mathur, Advocate, for Respondent ORDER The issue in this appeal is, whether the appellant has provided service under the category of Supply of Tangible Goods . 2. The admitted facts, as per the Show Cause Notice, are that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Revenue that there is no sale of goods in terms of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 and further State levy of VAT for right to use as per the constitutional provisions, nowhere affects, simultaneous levy of Service Tax under the category of Supply of Tangible Goods . Accordingly, invoking the extended period vide Show Cause Notice dated 18/02/2015, proposing demand of Service Tax of ₹ 22,48,253/- for the period January, 2013 to September, 2014. The Show Cause Notice was adjudicated by the Additional Commissioner, was pleased to hold that the respondent has provided service under the category of Supply of Tangible Goods and accordingly, confirmed the demand with interest and equal amount of penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 19 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... provides that such services are for use, without transferring right of possession and effective control of such machinery, equipment and appliances. There is no allegation nor any finding by the courts below that the right of Possession and/or effective control of the furniture/ equipment was not given by the respondent to its customers. Thus, the essential facts for levy of Service Tax under the category of Supply of Tangible Goods are wanting and accordingly, I hold that the Show Cause Notice is vague and not maintainable. I, further; find no impropriety in the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). Accordingly, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) is upheld. The respondent-asse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates