TMI Blog2018 (8) TMI 363X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in this case, especially, does not disclose that the petitioner has urged an issue of jurisdiction. This Court is of the opinion that given the circumstances of this case, it would be appropriate for the petitioner to approach the CESTAT against the impugned order - petition disposed off. - W.P.(C) 6561/2018 & CM APPL. 25039-40/2018 - - - Dated:- 16-7-2018 - MR. S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND MR. A. K. C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of existing adjudicatory officials, especially the Commissioners of Central Excise and Customs. The petitioner submits that the Notification dated 19.06.2017 had the effect of transferring jurisdiction to the Commissioner now exercising jurisdiction over it i.e. the concerned Commissioner at Gurugram since it is now located there and the respondents are well aware of this. The impugned order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
