Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Category of Documents

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
Highlights
D. Forum
What's New

Share:      

        Home        
 

TMI Blog

Home List
← Previous Next →

2018 (10) TMI 695

had availed CENVAT Credit on input service, was within the time limit stipulated under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 or not? - Held that:- The reasoning given by the first appellate authority namely, that the invoices have been raised beyond the time provided under Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules is without any justification. As pointed out by the adjudicating authority, the issue relates to the availment of CENVAT Credit beyond the time limit specified in CENVAT Credit Rules and this has been clarified by the Board vide Notification No. 21/2014. - Further, there is no dispute that the CENVAT Credit has been availed here in this case in February, 2015 which is within six months period and thereby, satisfying with the CBEC Notificat .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

was contrary to Notification No. 21/2014-CE (NT) dated 11.07.2014. 1.3 The appellant filed a detailed reply contending inter alia that the Directors were paid the commission on 29.11.2014; that the commission was for a continuous service which are not based on individual transactions; that they continued to be the Directors and thereby, the commission was provided continuously; the point of taxation was to be decided by applying the first proviso to Rule 3 of Point of Taxation Rules when the commission having been paid on 29.11.2014 was relevant to determine the point of taxation; that the input tax credit was distributed based on the invoice raised on 28.02.2015 which was well within the period stipulated under rule 4 of the CENVAT Credit .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

or the above reasons, the first appellate authority set aside the Order-in-Original and confirmed the demand, interest and equal penalty proposed in the Show Cause Notice dated 19.02.2016. The assessee has therefore filed this appeal feeling aggrieved by the above Order of the Commissioner (Appeals). 2. When the matter came up for hearing Ms. K. Nancy, Ld. Advocate appeared for the appellant and Shri. R. Subramaniyan, Ld. AC (AR) appeared for the Revenue. 3. I have heard the rival contentions, perused the documents placed on record and have also gone through the facts. 4.1 Admittedly, in this case the CENVAT Credit availed of ₹ 15,86,158/- has been distributed on pro rata basis by the Input Service Distributor (ISD) to the appellant w .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map ||