TMI Blog2019 (10) TMI 380X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... finding of fact rendered by the Original Authority as well as the Appellate Authority which confirmed the same. This court find that no grounds are made out to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge which has confirmed the concurrent finding rendered by the 2nd respondent-Original Authority and as well as the 1st respondent-Appellate Authority in deciding that the withdrawal of Letter of Permission issued in favour of petitioner on 08.10.2007 which appears to be just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case - this intra-court appeal is dismissed. - W.A.NO.100127/2019 (GM-RES) - - - Dated:- 4-9-2019 - MR. S.N. SATYANARAYANA AND MR. G.M. PATIL JJ. APPELLANT (BY SRI SANJAY CHANAL, ADVOCATE) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gulation) Act, 1992 and also under Rule 17 of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993 which were violated in non-implementation of the aforesaid Letter of Permission. Though a reply was tendered by the appellant herein on 06.07.2012, the contents of reply did not satisfactorily answer the inordinate delay in implementation of the project pursuant to Letter of Permission issued on 08.10.2007. 5. It is in this background, the 1st respondent proceeded to pass an order on 08.01.2013 in declaring that the supply effected by appellant herein to their principle M/s TIMKEN India Manufacturing Private Limited through their customers does not amount to deemed export and that they have not fulfilled the conditions of Letter of Permission d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was no error or perversity in the reasonings assigned by the Original Authority vide Annexure-7D to the writ petition or the Appellate Authority vide Annexure-A while arriving at the conclusion rendered by them. It was also held by the learned Single Judge that no material either produced or demonstrated before the learned Single Judge to conclude contrary to the finding of fact rendered by the Original Authority as well as the Appellate Authority which confirmed the same. 8. In that view of the matter, this court find that no grounds are made out to interfere with the order of the learned Single Judge which has confirmed the concurrent finding rendered by the 2nd respondent-Original Authority and as well as the 1st respondent-App ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
