2022 (12) TMI 1550

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Respondent : Mr. Karan Sachdev and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advocates. ORDER 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order dated 23.12.2011, passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Service Tax Appeal No. 1167/2011. 2. By an order dated 16.01.2013, this Court had framed the following questions for consideration: "(1) Whether the respondent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . It stands authoritatively held by this Court, in catena of pronouncements, including Commissioner of Service Tax v. Gecas Services India Pvt. Ltd. 2015 (39) STR 980 (Del), Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi v. Menon Associates 2017 (49) STR 284 (Del), Commissioner of Service Tax v. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd. 2015 (39) STR 973 (Del) and Commissioner of Service Tax, Delhi v. Transcorp Internation .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... fore this court. She however expresses an apprehension that the appellant may be disabled from filing an appeal before the Supreme Court in view of the internal instructions regarding the pecuniary limit for filing such appeals. 5. This Court is not called upon to examine the appellant's policy of filing appeals. Since, there is no dispute that the present appeal is not maintainable, the same is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X