Claim of exemption u/s 54 - exemption cannot be rejected simply ...

Income Tax

June 20, 2014

Claim of exemption u/s 54 - exemption cannot be rejected simply because of the fact that certain payments were made before the period / eligible time period starts from 19.10.2005 i.e. one year before the date of transfer - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Claim of exemption u/s 54 - exemption cannot be rejected simply ...

Income Tax

June 20, 2014

You may also like:

Eligibility to claim of exemption u/s 11 - justification of incurrence of certain expenses - payments made by the assessee Society to its members have not been shown to...

Nature of income on sale of flat – Exemption u/s 54 claimed - income is in the nature of business, therefore, the deduction u/s 54 not applicable - AT

Denial of the benefit claimed u/s 54 EC - exemption under section 54 EC is available even when the part of capital gain is invested in specified long-term asset - AT

Exemption u/s 54 - assessee purchased the new residential house within the time period stipulated in Sec.54 but possession was not taken - Asssessee was duly entitled...

Eligibility of deduction u/s 54 - LTCG - The possession of the said flat was given on 21.02.2009 and agreement for sale was made on 30.03.2009. Old flat was sold on 6th...

LTCG - Denial of exemption u/s 54 - the ITAT observed that, for the purpose of claiming the benefit u/s 54 of the Act, within a period of one year before or two year...

Exemption u/s 54 - assessee has invested in three residential house properties at three different places - scope of amendment - whether exemption is available in respect...

Entitlement to benefit u/s 54 - ascertaining limitation period of 2 years - consideration paid by assessee under Memorandum of Understanding dated 08.09.2003 would fully...

Claim of deduction u/s 54 of the Act - Two flats acquired under different agreements though single kitchen and used as one single unit - exemption allowed - HC

Disallowing the exemption claimed u/s 54 - Mere nonresidential use subsequently would not render the property ineligible for benefit u/s 54F, if it is otherwise a...

Quick Updates: