Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be ...

VAT and Sales Tax

March 25, 2015

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be proved as necessary ingredient for imposition of penalty under sub-section (5) of Section 78, on proving violation of sub-section(2) of Section 78 of the RST Act, 1994 - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty - The mens rea is not required to be ...

VAT and Sales Tax

March 25, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 53 - Karnataka VAT - Once statutory contravention is established, then section 53(12) is attracted which provides for levy of penalty - presence of Mens Rea...

CENVAT Credit availed wrongly on Capital goods - there is no sufficient evidence to prove Mens rea or guilt on the part of the assessee - no penalty - HC

Penalty u/s 116 – There was no requirement of proving mens rea on the part of person-in-charge of conveyance - CGOVT

If there is no mens rea, no mandatory penalty u/s 11AC - SC

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(2) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 - men-rea - The Court concluded that mens rea is indeed an essential prerequisite for imposing a penalty under...

Mere failure to carry the prescribed declaration form duly filled in is liable for penalty as per provisions of Section 78 (5) of the RST Act, and there is no need to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Default by assessee - mens rea is not an essential element for imposing penalty for non compliance of notices issued by AO - penalty confirmed - AT

Levy of penalty - mens rea in evasion of tax - It is well settled that by merely using the expression “mens rea”, it would not amount to concluding that there was a...

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The considerations for imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act are however entirely different. It requires existence of mens rea...

Quick Updates: