Additions u/s 69 - So long as the explanation is not sufficient ...

Income Tax

April 8, 2015

Additions u/s 69 - So long as the explanation is not sufficient and it can be termed as deemed income of HUFs, it is not necessary to further examine the aspect as to whether there was any income earned by the Company and as to whether there was diversion of money to the HUFs or not? - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Additions u/s 69 - So long as the explanation is not sufficient ...

Income Tax

April 8, 2015

You may also like:

Unexplained investment - Additions u/s 69 - source of purchase of party - AO having not discharged onus for proving the satisfaction of the condition for application of...

Revision u/s 263 - No doubt, these transactions were not recorded at the time of survey thus qualify as unrecorded transactions satisfying one of the essential...

Unexplained investment u/s 69 - The aspect that this income was not declared in the original return of income cannot be a ground to automatically conclude that it is...

Deemed dividend under sec. 2(22)(e) - Initially, the assessee has chosen to declare the deemed dividend in his hand, later come with different explanation at different...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - the transaction has never been examined by the assessing officer. No enquiry has been conducted relating to the alleged sum....

Unexplained money u/s 69A or investment u/s 69 - Once an AO finds that an investment has been made, he has to examine the Assessee's explanation as to the source of that...

Addition on account of cash found short u/s 68 and also holding that the same to be taxed u/s 115BBE - Cash short, at the most represents expenses / outgoings out of...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 69 - taxability of income u/s 115BBE - nature and source of the surrendered income during the course of survey operation - the assessee...

Salary income - additions towards difference between returned income and as per 26AS - there was dispute between employee and employer therefore, it was necessary for...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Quick Updates: