Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2015 Year 2015 This

Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner ...

Service Tax

May 8, 2015

Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner (Appeals) that appellant was under a bonafide belief that service tax as demanded was not payable, then a view can not be entertained that the facts will justify imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Extended period of limitation - bonafide belief - marketing agent service - Business Auxiliary Service - demand and penalty both set aside - AT

  2. Penalty u/s 78 - they were under bonafide belief that service provided from SEZ unit is not chargeable to Service Tax. Therefore the payment of Service Tax was escaped...

  3. Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

  4. Whether construction of hospital is a commercial or industrial construction - appellant cannot be prima facie faulted for having entertained a bonafide belief that their...

  5. Cenvat credit wrongly availed - appellant had entertained bonafide belief regarding availability of cenvat credit and therefore, extended period is not invokable - AT

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – assessee has bonafide belief in making the claim that gain arising out of sale of agricultural land is exempt from tax - no penalty - AT

  7. Demand of service tax - providing security services to other group companies - No profit motive - Bonafide belief is not blind belief but has to be based on reasonable...

  8. Penalty for concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act - Claim of capital loss as bad debt - bonafide belief - no penalty - HC

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - taxability of Sale of Space or Time for Advertisement - it is a case of bonafide mistake - no penalty - AT

  10. Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates