Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2015 Year 2015 This

There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action ...

Income Tax

June 20, 2015

There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action of the AO can be held to be justified to show that the expenses are unreasonable or excessive u/s 40A(2)(b). In the absence of any such evidence, an adhoc disallowance of 5% has rightly been rejected by the CIT(A) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Agents incentive expenses - AO has not established that the payments made to the related parties are excessive or unreasonable under the three criterias specified in...

  2. IT - Sec. 40A(2) - increase in remuneration to Directors - when CLB had approved the remuneration it could not be said that the expenditure was excessive or unreasonable - AT

  3. Disallowance u/s. 40(A)(2)(b) - excessive salary payment - payment to close associates / related parties - AO can disallow only that portion of the total expenditure,...

  4. Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - excessive or unreasonable payments made to specified persons - AO has not done any exercise to determine as to whether the amount paid by...

  5. Disallowances u/s 40A(2)(b) - payment of commission to related party - There is no reasoning given by the ld AO that why the earlier two payment to the same party for...

  6. Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - there should be some material available before the AO for invoking section 40A(2)(a) to initiate action to disallow or refuse to deduct the...

  7. Revision u/s 263 - Excessive payment to related party or not - Payments for job work not verified by AO at "fair market value" under section 40A(2)(b) - the onus is on...

  8. Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - for the purpose of disallowing a deduction, AO has to form an opinion not only that the expenditure is excessive or unreasonable, but that...

  9. Addition u/s 40(A) - service charges paid to division of the holding company - assessee has been able to demonstrate that the services were charged by SCS to the...

  10. Travelling & conveyance (Director) expenditure - assessee shown its inability to produce any documentary evidence - Disallowance of 25% made by the AO is not unreasonable - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates