Effective date and time of effective Rate of Duty - bill of ...

Customs

June 24, 2015

Effective date and time of effective Rate of Duty - bill of entry was filed filed on 03.08.2001 - notification was sent for publication after the normal office hours, i.e., much after 5 p.m. on 03.08.2001 - it was not justified and lawful on the part of the Department to claim the differential amount of duty on the basis of said notification - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Effective date and time of effective Rate of Duty - bill of ...

Customs

June 24, 2015

You may also like:

Effective date of notification - tariff rate - import of edible oil including palmolein oil - In the present case, admittedly, second condition was not satisfied...

Rebate claim - effective rate of Central Excise duty was reduced from 10% to 8% - rebate is admissible of duty paid at effective rate of duty on 24-2-2009 i.e. @ 8% - CGOVT

Rate of Customs duty - Effective date of notification - on the date of bill of entry or date of clearance of goods - u/s 46 of the Act, the rate of duty enforced on the...

Amend notification No. 11/2017-Central Excise so as to omit an entry with respect to chapter 24 - Effective Rate of Duty of excise

Effective rates of customs duty and IGST for goods imported into India. - Notification as amended from time to time.

Refund claim - Import of 8 consignments of ferrite magnets - importer did not claim the benefit of Notification No. 12/2012 in the Bill of Entry so filed - refund allowed - AT

Effective rate of basic duty of customs under chapters 50 to 63 on textile products - Notification

Refund of Anti-Dumping Duty paid - Polished Porcelain Tiles - A Notification comes into force only from the date of its publication, since Anti-Dumping duty Notification...

Date on which Notification coming into force - N/N. 120/2003 dated 01.08.2003 - whether the Notification is effective from the date of publication i.e. 01.08.2003 as...

Exemption notification - Concessional rate of duty - actual user condition - As the procedure set out in the 2001 Rules has not been followed, the appellant was not...

Quick Updates: