Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Even on belated ...

VAT and Sales Tax

July 9, 2015

Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Even on belated production of statutory forms (‘C’ Forms and ‘H’ Forms), the statutory authority is bound to take into consideration the same and give the benefit of reduction of the tax. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Bar of limitation - Even on belated ...

VAT and Sales Tax

July 9, 2015

You may also like:

Denial of refund claim - Pre mature refund claim - appellants are at liberty to file the refund claim even though the matter is still pending before the Apex Court - AT

Refund claim rejected as time bar - The original authority and the lower appellate authority being creatures of the statute, prima facie are required to follow the...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - When the provisions of Central Excise are not applicable in that case bar of unjust enrichment is also not applicable - AT

Refund claim - Reassessment - assessee having not challenged the order of assessment, cannot at a belated stage, claim refund by pressing into service another Notification- HC

Claim of refund - Interest on delayed refund - limitation bar - Section 11BB - Price variation clause - the claim is hopelessly time barred. - AT

Denial of Refund claim - excess duty paid at the time of import by them did not form part of the cost of production and they have passed the bar of unjust enrichment -...

Refund - The refund claims were declined only on one ground, without challenging the determination of annual capacity of production, the processor could not have...

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - Respondent filed refund claim consequential to the dropping of demand under adjudication order dated 27/11/2009 within 3 months -...

Refund claim - Bar of limitation - appellant’s refund claim was maintainable and tax paid by the appellant under misconception of law was to be refunded - AT

Quick Updates: