Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not ...

Income Tax

July 14, 2015

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not preferred any appeal against the said disallowance does not make it an inadvertent mistake - penalty confirmed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because, the assessee did not ...

Income Tax

July 14, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - If authority is satisfied that there was a reasonable cause, it may impose any penalty but inadvertent mistake cannot call for penalty in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - inadvertent mistake - assessee, the returned income was ₹ 35.37 crores and an error of ₹ 1,30,869/- and ₹ 1,01,956/-, which the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The calibre and expertise of the assessee has little or nothing to do with the inadvertent error. - SC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has furnished bonafide and genuine explanations as to an inadvertent mistake committed by it which was an human error committed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - mistake of wrong classification of the securities yielding Long Term Capital Gain and consequently the assessee had paid the tax @ 10% instead of...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - excess expenses disallowed and suppression of receipts - being bonafide mistake in accounting the total contract receipts, no penalty.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - for such lump-sum disallowance out of wages on the basis of presumption, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is leviable - AT

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Quick Updates: