The mere fact that an Assessee participated in the re-assessment ...

Income Tax

September 24, 2015

The mere fact that an Assessee participated in the re-assessment proceedings despite not having been issued or served with the notice under Section 148 of the Act in accordance with law will not constitute a waiver of the said jurisdictional requirement. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The mere fact that an Assessee participated in the re-assessment ...

Income Tax

September 24, 2015

You may also like:

Reassessment u/s 147 - improper service of notice u/s 148 - A notice was served at the registered office of the assessee company. The server of the department has...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Issuing of notice u/s 148 in the wrong name - it was only a typographical error in first name of the assessee though other...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - validation of notice issued to the old address - The argument advanced on behalf of the appellant/revenue that, as per Section 292BB,...

Notice u/s 148 send through registered post is presumed to be served

Reopening of assessment - service of notice - The mere fact that an Assessee or some other person on his behalf not duly authorised participated in the reassessment...

Re opening of assessment - before issuance of notice u/s 148 reasons were recorded for one issue only - reaons for other two issues were recorded after issuance of ...

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Jurisdiction to issue Notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act - Issuance of Notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment on the basis of ‘Borrowed satisfaction’ -...

Notice u/s 148 - AO has not recorded any reasons for re-assessment proceedings and merely acted on the borrowed satisfaction recorded by another AO without jurisdiction...

Income escaping assessment - non mentioning of AY in the notice u/s 148 - Unless it is shown that assessee was misled by not mentioning the AY, proceedings can not be quashed - HC

Quick Updates: