Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Companies Law - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2015 Year 2015 This

Recovery of debts - period of limitation – Petitioner failed to ...

Companies Law

October 3, 2015

Recovery of debts - period of limitation – Petitioner failed to prosecute its civil and company law rights with due care and diligence - Petition accordingly would stand dismissed - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Income–tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - Amendments in Due diligence requirement - Notification

  2. CIRP - right of the creditors for recovery of dues of the corporate debtors from the third parties - It is for the Resolution Professional or the successful resolution...

  3. Delay in filing the appeal u/s 260A - condonation of delay of 79 days - exclusion of certain period while computing period of limitation - the time spent by the...

  4. Bad debts - Provision for doubtful debts and doubtful advances - Assessee has not written off the provision for doubtful debts in the individual ledger account of the...

  5. CIRP - Grounds on which the Liquidator can be changed - the non-holding of a valid AFA will not render the order of liquidation passed by the Adjudicating Authority...

  6. Loss on pictures - bad debts - the assessee has claimed to incurred Loss due to non-recovery of advances and therefore, claimed it as loss which is not impermissible under the law.

  7. Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 - Client Due Diligence - filing of the electronic copy of the client's KYC records...

  8. Client Due Diligence. - Rule 9 of the PREVENTION OF MONEY-LAUNDERING (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005, as amended

  9. Client Due Diligence - liability of Every reporting entity to get and verify the identity of the client - Rule 9 of PML (MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS) RULES, 2005 as amended

  10. Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates