Rejection of books of accounts u/s 145(3) - assesee was dealing ...

Income Tax

October 10, 2015

Rejection of books of accounts u/s 145(3) - assesee was dealing in gems and jewellery - It is difficult to maintain the stock register in this line of business of the assessee. The number of diamond pieces is also differs on size to size and accordingly valuation of diamond jewellery varies from item to item. - rejection is not valid - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rejection of books of accounts u/s 145(3) - assesee was dealing ...

Income Tax

October 10, 2015

You may also like:

Rejection of books of account u/s 145(3) - non maintenance of stock register was not sufficient for exercising the power of rejecting the books of the assessee. - It is...

Rejection of books of accounts - valuation of the closing stock - gross profit margin - Assessment was complete u/s 143(3) - After that, during survey u/s 133A, assessee...

Invocation of section 145(3) - existence of infirmities and discrepancies in the accounts maintained by the assessee was a pre-requisite for invoking the provisions of...

Rejection of books of accounts - the assessee is not maintaining the proper books of account with regard to stock - to plug the leakage of revenue, certain disallowance...

Rejection of books of account merely for absence of stock register - o satisfactory explanation had been furnished by the assessee for not maintaining the stock register....

Rejection of books of account u/s.145 is justifiable as two diaries in which unaccounted payments to the partner and unaccounted expenses recorded, were found - AT

Rejection of Books of Accounts - mere disclosure of a low net profit would not enable the AO to invoke the provisions of section 145(1) - HC

Addition made on account for rejection of books u/s 145 - AO has given one hour to produce details - Case remand back to AO - AT

Rejection of books of accounts - rejection of books of account by invoking the provisions of section 145(3) - the AO has categorically noted in the assessment order...

Disallowance of total contract expenses - required details of contract expense were not submitted before the AO - Therefore, we confirm the order of rejection U/s 145(3) - AT

Quick Updates: