Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - AO has not specified the ...

Income Tax

October 23, 2015

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - AO has not specified the relevant portion of the clause (c) of the notice under Section 274 rws 271 of the Act for initiating penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) - Notice is invalid - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) - AO has not specified the ...

Income Tax

October 23, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - The notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(l)(c) of the Act were issued without striking off the irrelevant portion of the limb...

CIRP - Validity of penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act - The Assessment Order of A.Y. 2018-19 year and notice u/s 274 rws 271 AAC(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...

Penalty proceedings initiated u/s 271(1)(c) is void ab initio and liable to be quashed as the AO has issued vague notice u/s 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) without striking off of...

Validity of penalty orders u/s 271AAB - penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271 - penalty where the search has been initiated - levy of penalty sustained - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of clear charge - undisclosed unsold inventory - Notice u/s. 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act was issued without striking off...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - AO has miserably failed to specify in the notice issued under section 274 read with...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Mandation of specification of charge - It is clear that for the AO to assume jurisdiction u/s 271(1)(c), proper notice is necessary and the...

Penalty order u/s 271(1)(c) deleted for want of a valid show cause notice u/s 274 of the Act. - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c)...

Quick Updates: