Denial of benefit of Notification - wrong mention of ...

Central Excise

October 26, 2015

Denial of benefit of Notification - wrong mention of notification no. in the declaration - merely because the number of the Notification mentioned in the declaration was other than the number of the correct Notification, respondent could not be denied the benefit of the said Notification - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of benefit of Notification - wrong mention of ...

Central Excise

October 26, 2015

You may also like:

Cenvat credit - mere wrong vehicle numbers cannot be made the basis for denial of credit .... – AT

Denial of Cenvat credit – credit cannot be denied on the input service on the mere ground of non-mention of registration number in the invoices - stay granted on this count - AT

Denial of CENVAT Credit on Goods Transport Agency Service – duty paying document - excise number of other unit was mentioned wrongly in GAR-7 challan - apparently credit...

Mis-declaration of imported goods - Import of D. C. Defibrillators’ (DCD) with Standard Accessories - The wrong serial number of notification mentioned during filling of...

Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Denial of rebate claim - export of exempted goods - non-observance of the conditions prescribed in the notifications mentioned above, would result in denial of the rebate - AT

Refund claim of 4% of SAD - There is no condition in the Notification that the Bill of Entry number should be mentioned in the sale invoice - AT

Non-payment of Service Tax - Mentioning of wrong service tax registration in the payment challan for two months - Mentioning of wrong location code - in view of the...

Under-declaration - processed fabric – Job Work - The under-declaration was on account of wrong declaration given by the merchant manufacturer and not the appellant - no...

Goods cleared for construction of water treatment plant - benefit of exemption - Mistake in mentioning the wrong notification number cannot be the sole reason for...

Quick Updates: