TCS u/s 206C - Not collection of tax at source on Old and used ...

Income Tax

November 25, 2015

TCS u/s 206C - Not collection of tax at source on Old and used plates, Non-excisable (exempted) like furniture, wood, etc., Trading of scrap (melting) and High seas sale - the products obtained by the assessee in the course of ship breaking activity are usable as such, and, therefore, do not fall within the definition of scrap - TCS u/s 206C is not required - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

TCS u/s 206C - Not collection of tax at source on Old and used ...

Income Tax

November 25, 2015

You may also like:

Denial of Tax Collected at Source (TCS) credit u/s 206C(1C) - denial of credit tantamount to confiscating assessee's tax for which corresponding income is included in...

Whether Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd. and Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. are group companies under FTP.

TCS - Sale of sawn timber does not fall under the ambit of tax collection at source within the meaning of section 206C - AT

TCS - Time and mode of payment to Government account of tax collected at source under section 206C.

Item sold in scrap i.e. Tin, iron scrap, plastic drum etc. is not scrap generated from manufacturing process - No liability to deduct TCS U/s 206C - AT

Demand u/s 206C(1)/206C(7) - TCS - 206C(1A) mandates person responsible for TCS to not collect taxes if he obtains a declaration from the buyer that he is purchasing the...

TCS u/s 206C - TCS & interest liability where the buyer has paid the taxes - sale of ship-breaking scrap against delcaration in Form no. 27C - matter remanded back to...

Non-collection of TCS u/s 206C - there is no ambiguity that the seller of forest product is required to collect tax on forest produce. But the “Minor Forest Product” are...

TCS u/s 206C - sale of forest produce, not being timber or tendu leaves - waiver from collection of TCS - matter remanded back for reconsideration - AT

Administrative support agreement with various Tata companies - prior to 01/07/2003, the services rendered by the appellant do not merit classification under “Management...

Quick Updates: