Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal ...

Central Excise

December 4, 2015

Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal committed a manifest error in non-suiting the appellant's claim on the sole ground that the appellant was only a buyer and, therefore, was not entitled to claim a refund of the duty. This finding is patently perverse. Section 11-B of the Act provides that any person can make an application for refund of duty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Denial of refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Tribunal ...

Central Excise

December 4, 2015

You may also like:

Refund claim for the amount of CVD paid - time limitation - Duty was paid under protest or not - The appellant, an importer of silk yarn and silk fabrics, filed a refund...

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of duty paid under protest – unjust enrichment is not applicable where amount deposited under protest - AT

Refund claim - non-mentioning of the commission made in the shipping bill is a technical error and since such amount has been paid by the assessee, the refund benefit...

Manufacture - marketability - Exemption to specified goods - The Tribunal having misread the entire evidence on record committed manifest error in reversing the order...

Refund - Taxability of service - construction of complex service or works contract service - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - period of limitation not applicable - AT

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - The sole contention of the appellant was that they had deposited the duty under protest and that they had not passed on the...

Quick Updates: