MAT applicability - The provisions of section 115JB of the act ...

Income Tax

December 5, 2015

MAT applicability - The provisions of section 115JB of the act are not applicable in the case of the Banks and the amendment brought in section 115JB of the Act read with Explanation 3 thereon by the Finance Act 2012 is applicable only with effect from Asst Year 2013-14- AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

MAT applicability - The provisions of section 115JB of the act ...

Income Tax

December 5, 2015

You may also like:

MAT applicability - Provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to the banking company - AT

MAT applicability to the assessee Banking Companies u/s 115JB - the provisions of Section 115JB(2) of the Act do not apply to the Banking companies.

MAT - Addition of Book Profits u/s 115JB – Dividend Stripping u/s 94(7) - The Explanation (f) of Section 115JB was clearly applicable in case of the appellant - AT

Book adjustments u/s 115JB - Insurance company - Minimum alternate tax (MAT) - these companies cannot be treated differently for the purpose of sec. 115JB - provisions...

MAT computation u/s 115JB - unabsorbed depreciation adjustment - the brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation as per the books and as per the provisions of...

Scope of applicability of MAT u/s 115JB - Considering amendments and the provisions existing prior to 01.04.2013, we notice that prior to 01.04.2013 the type of...

MAT - Provision for bad and doubtful debts are required to be added to book profit as per clause (i) of explanation [1] to subsection [2] of section 115JB - AT

MAT - Section 115JB - assessee is trying to compute the brought forward losses under the normal Income-tax Act provisions and not under the Companies Act - not allowed - AT

Applicability of MAT section 115JB to the assessee being a Banking Company - there is not a single decision of the Jurisdictional High Court or even of any other Hon’ble...

MAT - Deduction for provision of bad and doubtful debts while computing book profits u/s.115JB - There is absolutely no quarrel that the case does not fall under Clause...

Quick Updates: