TDS u/s 194J or 192 - payments made to doctors who are regular ...

Income Tax

December 21, 2015

TDS u/s 194J or 192 - payments made to doctors who are regular employees of the hospital - it is not a case of employer-employee relationship between the assessee and the doctors. - TDS liable to be deducted u/s 194J - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

TDS u/s 194J or 192 - payments made to doctors who are regular ...

Income Tax

December 21, 2015

You may also like:

TDS u/s 192 OR 194J - payment to Hospital Based Consultants (HBCs) / Doctors - Employee employer relationship exists or not - TDS was rightly deducted u/s 194J.

TDS on fee paid to doctors – Doctors treated as consultants – there is no employer and employee relationship existing - tax has to be deducted u/s 194J and not u/s 192 - AT

TDS u/s 194C or 192 - existence of employer and employee relationship between the doctors and hospital - fact remains that as per details filed by the assessee,...

TDS u/s 192 or 194J - There was no specific timing and attendance record maintained by hospital with respect to such doctors and this category of doctors was not be...

TDS u/s 192 or 194J - payment to the consultant-doctors and retainer-doctors - Whether there was employer- employee relation between both the parties? - Certain clauses...

Non deduction of TDS on payment for professional fees as towards directors salary - Unless employee employer relationship exists, no TDS u/s 194J before 1.7.2012 - AT

TDS u/s 195 r.w.s. 192 - salary costs of a seconded employee - The employees in their capacity as employees of the assessee had to control and supervise the activities...

Doctor receiving regular fixed receipt from Hospital – assessee cannot be said to be an employee and his income can only be taxed under the head income from business and...

Penalty u/s 271C - Payment to Doctors - Employer / Employee relationship or not - AO directed to verify the facts - If it is found that these doctors were providing...

Doctors to be treated as employees or not – Tribunal rightly found that there is no employer and employee relationship and the payment cannot be treated to be salaries...

Quick Updates: