Benefit of concessional rate of duty of import under Project ...

Customs

December 28, 2015

Benefit of concessional rate of duty of import under Project Import Regulation, 1986 - same concessional rate of duty would have been available to the appellant if they had imported goods under chapter heading 84.79 and not as Project Imports under Chapter heading 98.01 - lapses condoned - demand set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Benefit of concessional rate of duty of import under Project ...

Customs

December 28, 2015

You may also like:

Project Import - benefit of concessional rate of duty - the appellants had registered the contract before clearance of the warehoused goods and hence they are eligible...

Denial of benefit of Project Import Regulations, 1986 - increase of more than 25% in the installed capacity is not achieved - AT

Eligibility of assessment of construction equipments under Project Imports Regulations (PIR), 1986 – Instructions - regarding. - Cir. No. 49 / 2011-Customs Dated: November 4, 2011

Eligibility for benefit of reduced Custom duty under Project Import Regulations, 1986 - as regulation no. 7 was not in the statute when the goods were imported, hence it...

Production of “installation” certificate of the goods imported free of duty under the “Project Import Regulations, 1986” - The Tribunal after considering the documents...

Eligibility of dumpers imported for Coal Mines for benefits under Project Import Regulations- reg. - Order-Instruction

ICES Advisory 10/2020 (Project Imports) — Option to debit duty through Duty Scrips for Project Import BEs - Trade Notice

Mega Power Project - Exemption under Notification no. 21/2002 - Project Import - Import of ‘gas turbine components’ and ‘generator transformers’ - Benefit of exemption denied - AT

Denial of benefit of Project Imports Regulations, 1986 - substantial benefit of exemption from Customs duty has wrongly been denied by invoking procedural provision...

Project import - failure to produce installation certificate - especially considering that appellant has submitted other proof to establish the installation, cannot then...

Quick Updates: