Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - ...

Central Excise

December 28, 2015

Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - unjust enrichment - appellant has been showing the amount for which refund is claimed, in the balance sheet under head loan and in advances. - appellant has not expensed out the amounts which have been paid by them as excess Central Excise duty - Refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - ...

Central Excise

December 28, 2015

You may also like:

Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - price inclusive of duty of excise - maintaining uniformity of price - duty paid under protest - refund allowed - HC

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund - valuation - price variation clause in the rate contract - excess payment of duty due to downward revision in the price / rate – unjust enrichment - refund allowed - AT

Refund - price revision clause - valuation - Excess payment of duty - supply of LPG Cylinders to IOC Ltd. and HPC Ltd. - Unjust enrichment - refund allowed - AT

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

Refund Claim - unjust enrichment - As the entire amount has been recovered from the ultimate buyers including the duty element, unjust enrichment is attracted.

Refund claim rejected – Unjust enrichment - the appellant’s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment principles - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund of excess duty paid on actual consumption of bunkers on the vessel during coastal trade - Unjust enrichment - Refund allowed - AT

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Quick Updates: