Levy of penalty on courier agency on the ground that they have ...

Customs

January 14, 2016

Levy of penalty on courier agency on the ground that they have failed to exercise due diligence in performing their work as an authorized courier and thus, their inaction/negligence has led to this attempt of smuggling of costly goods in the guise of low value spare parts. - penalty confirmed, though reduced - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty on courier agency on the ground that they have ...

Customs

January 14, 2016

You may also like:

When Customs could detect the mis-declaration simply by examining the weight of the consignment with respect to declaration made, it could have been possible for Courier...

Revocation of CHA License - appellant failed to verify the address at which the two clients operated and that requirement of ‘know your customer (KYC)’ was entirely...

Recovery of debts - period of limitation – Petitioner failed to prosecute its civil and company law rights with due care and diligence - Petition accordingly would...

Violation of provisions of Section 10(6) of the FEMA Act - Responsibility of Authorised person - Considering the fact that the appellant admittedly became aware of the...

Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Income–tax (15th Amendment) Rules, 2016 - Amendments in Due diligence requirement - Notification

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer Pricing adjustment made - applying the analysis of the term ‘good faith’ and ‘due diligence’ we are of the considered view that in the...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act - vicarious liability of appellant / Pre-Shipment Inspection Agency - Nothing has been brought on record as to show, how due...

CIRP - Grounds on which the Liquidator can be changed - the non-holding of a valid AFA will not render the order of liquidation passed by the Adjudicating Authority...

Levy of penalty on an authorised courier - failure to collect KYC - There is no violation of the provisions of Regulation 12(i), (iv) and (v) as the appellant has...

Quick Updates: