Revocation of CHA licence - unauthorized usage of the CHA ...

Customs

January 18, 2016

Revocation of CHA licence - unauthorized usage of the CHA licence - Save and except venial breach on part of CHA under Regulation 13(n) of the CHALR, no other Articles of Charges are proved against the appellant CHA - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revocation of CHA licence - unauthorized usage of the CHA ...

Customs

January 18, 2016

You may also like:

Revocation of CHA License - Misdeclaration of goods - the appellant totally failed to discharge its duties as CHA with utmost speed and efficiency and thereby grossly...

Revocation of CHA licence – CHA sublet his licence for a consideration in gross violation of Regulation 12 of CHALR, 2004 and this is an act of corruption - AT

Revocation of CHA Licence - the CHA firm is responsible for the forgery of documents by their employee. There is gross violation of Regulation 13(a), 13(d), 19(8) and...

Revocation of CHA License - forfeiture of security deposit - There is a clear evidence on part of the appellant as CHA to fail to discharge the duty casted upon under...

Penalty u/s 271B - failure to get accounts audited - for technical and venial breach on the part of Chartered Accountant of the assessee, the assessee cannot be penalized

Revocation of CHA License - CHA has resorted to forgery of export documents, which cannot be regarded as minor or inconsequential - AT

Revocation of CHA License - Merely, that the appellant has filed appeal against earlier invocation of licence, could not extend statutory time limit as prescribed under...

If the respondent CHA had committed any contravention of CHALR, remedies lies in taking action under CHALR and not under the Customs Act. - AT

Revocation of Customs Broker license - respondent failed to adhere to Regulation 13(a) of the CHALR, 2004 - The order passed by the learned Tribunal setting aside the...

Revocation of CHA License - Since there is no charge against the custom broker of attempting to influence the Customer Officer, the charge under Regulation 11(i) cannot be upheld.

Quick Updates: