Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2016 Year 2016 This

When the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner concurrently ...

Income Tax

February 11, 2016

When the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner concurrently found that there was unexplained expenditure and source of such income was not satisfactorily explained, section 69C of the Act would certainly be applicable. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Disallowance of payment to sub-contractor - disallowance of 10% from the other payments - the contractors had worked and the TDS was made from the payments but the...

  2. Additions made u/s 69C - unexplained expenditure – Whether the Assessing Officer had acted on conjectures and surmises – Held no, additions confirmed - HC

  3. Unexplained purchase u/s 69C - Section 69C clearly refers to the “source of the expenditure” and not to the expenditure itself - AT

  4. Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained credit - scope of amended provisions of section 68 - onus to prove source of source - Although, the issue before us pertains to assessment...

  5. Unaccounted expenditure - Unexplained source of cash - it is difficult to believe that a person who withdraws money from the bank account gives it to someone else for...

  6. Addition on unexplained cash deposit - source of cash - where no books of accounts are maintained the peak theory is best method to assess the actual income earned from...

  7. Addition of cash deposited during the demonetisation period in bank account - unexplained income - taxation @ 60% as provided u/s. 115BBE - The tribunal acknowledged the...

  8. Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure incurred for purpose of development of hotel claimed - We restore the issue to file of the Assessing Officer...

  9. Addition on account of difference in stock found during survey u/s 132 - As the discrepancy could not be reconciled and satisfactorily explained by assessee, addition upheld - AT

  10. Unexplained share capital u/s 68 - the Revenue cannot be held to be an aggrieved party once CIT(A) has deleted the impugned addition based on Assessing Officer...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates