Valuation of Ceramic tableware - damage in the goods in question ...

Customs

March 1, 2016

Valuation of Ceramic tableware - damage in the goods in question were of different degree when compared with the goods which were auctioned earlier, where the damage was not to this much extent. Therefore, the value fetched during the auction as cum-value accepted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Valuation of Ceramic tableware - damage in the goods in question ...

Customs

March 1, 2016

You may also like:

Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on Ceramic Tableware and Kitchenware, excluding knives and toilet items, originating in or exported from China PR - Notification

Undervaluation - MRP based valuation u/s 4A - change in MRP subsequent to removal of goods - non declaration of the actual MRP on ceramic glazed tiles - Demand set aside - AT

Classification of imported goods - Melamine ware viz Kitchenware and Tableware - the goods were appropriately classifiable under heading 392410 and not under heading 392490.

Valuation of imported goods - Pistachio - Rule 8 of Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 - the comparison with the price of the different goods of different period cannot be...

Valuation - compensation for damage, breakage or loss suffered by the goods after removal from the factory, was not permissible to be deducted from value - AT

100% EOU - return of damaged goods - goods were damaged in transit while they were taken out for export - since goods are not cleared for DTA, demand of duty set aside.

Denial of Central excise registration - property was purchased by the assessee in auction - default of excise duty by the earlier registrant - registration allowed - AT

CENVAT Credit of duty paid on products sold under combo scheme of goods manufactured - CENVAT Credit of duty paid on ceramic mugs is allowable as input credit - AT

The valuation of the goods in question being food supplements, not containing beef has to be done under rule 7 of the Valuation Rules (deductive method).

Valuation made by the assessee exceeds the value adopted by the stamp valuation authority - No question of referring the valuation of the plots in question to the...

Quick Updates: