Following activities undertaken by the applicant would not ...

Central Excise

March 3, 2016

Following activities undertaken by the applicant would not amount to manufacture or deemed manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, namely; Inspection, testing and installing batteries, Cleaning, lint brushing and deodorizing, Touching up and re-stitching, Filing, debundling and jewellery correction, Activities related to spectacles and frames, Folding, hanging and ironing, Polishing, shinning and coating, Tagging, Freebies, Protective stickering, Placing the products in original box, Inserting warranty card, Inserting moisture absorbing tablets, Inserting books mark and Replacing shoe laces.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Following activities undertaken by the applicant would not ...

Central Excise

March 3, 2016

You may also like:

Manufacture - whether the activity by the applicant of bending, assembly and inspection of end formed tubes amount to manufacturing within the meaning of the Central...

Adjustment of refund sanctioned towards the pending arrears in terms of Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - amounts cannot be appropriated towards the Revenue...

The activity of loading of business software in the Hardware / Nucleus Device by the applicant will not constitute manufacture under the Central Excise Law - not liable...

Process amounting to manufacture - When the process of cutting and slitting itself does not amount to manufacture within the meaning of Section 2 (f) of the Central...

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

Recovery of amount u/s 11D - even if it is assumed that the process of blending of ethanol with motor spirit does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central...

Manufacturing activity or not - whether making pencil slats from wooden logs (timber) would amount to manufacture and whether such pencil slats would attract Central...

Refund of amount deposited as service tax during investigation - not hit by limitation under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act 1944 - refund allowed - AT

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Confiscation of land, buildings etc. - invocation of powers under Rule 173(Q)(2) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on 26.03.2007 and 29.03.2007 for confiscation of land,...

Quick Updates: