Revision u/s 263 - AO has to consider the provisions applicable ...

Income Tax

March 10, 2016

Revision u/s 263 - AO has to consider the provisions applicable under Rule 8D effective from assessment year 2008-09. But the AO made disallowance by following Co-ordinate Bench decision for earlier assessment year. It is apparent from facts and circumstances the order of the Assessing Officer is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue - Revision proceedings are correct - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - AO has to consider the provisions applicable ...

Income Tax

March 10, 2016

You may also like:

Applicability of section 292BB – The new provision is applicable for the assessment year 2008-09 and certainly not applicable for the assessment year under consideration...

Net profit @ 6% on bank deposits made - authorities below shall apply profit rate of 5% for the purpose of computing part addition as was directed in assessment year 2008-09 - AT

Addition made towards receipt Assignment of Fee - Assessee has withdrawn amount from Escrow account and utilized for its business purpose - Although, there is a timing...

Disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D - provisions of Rule 8D shall apply with effect from assessment year 2008-09 onwards. The Order of CIT (A) & AO is perverse - AT

The amount sought to be disallowed was debited in the financial year 2006-07 which is not at all relevant for the assessment year 2008-09 in which assessment is sought...

Inclusion of AY in which search was conducted into the period of 6 assessment years - recording of satisfaction during the next year - assessment for assessment year...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 80IC - Since, AO had not expressed any view in that behalf as is discernible from the assessment order, revision order sustained.

Revision u/s 263 - AO while completing the assessment u/s 143(3) never applied his mind to various issues as pointed out by the CIT - revision upheld - AT

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - Bogus share capital and share premium - Since, the present assessment year is 2008-09, there is no onus on the assessee to prove the...

Quick Updates: