Penalty under Section 11AC - The partner of the partnership ...

Central Excise

March 11, 2016

Penalty under Section 11AC - The partner of the partnership firm had already paid the duty before issue of the show cause notice in order to avoid legal proceedings. In such situation, imposition of separate penalty on the partner of the firm is not justified. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty under Section 11AC - The partner of the partnership ...

Central Excise

March 11, 2016

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 78 - suppression of facts - when mandatory penalty is imposable, whether the duty is paid before issue of show cause notice or after notice cannot alter the penalty.

Dissolution of partnership - taxability of sum received by a partner - Any amount paid to a partner as his share on dissolution of the partnership firm cannot be...

Penalty u/s 271C – reasonable cause - The assessees are partners in a firm – Both the assessees has paid interest to firm without deducting tax at source - No penalty - AT

Waiver of pre-deposit of penalty - default had already been made good by the Appellants much before the show cause notice was issued - prima facie no penalty is leviable - AT

Issuance of SCN and levy of penalty where service tax with interest paid before issuance of show cause notice - authorities are precluded from issue of show-cause notice - HC

Since the entire disputed amount of duty/service tax has been paid along with interest, even the show cause notice should not have been issued - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 112 - since penalty has been imposed on partnership firm under Section 112 (a), separate penalty on its partner would not be justified - AT

Penalty levied u/s 271D - capital contributed by the partner in the partnership firm does not tantamount to loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS - No penalty - AT

Imposition of Simultaneous Penalties - Whether CESTAT erred in imposing simultaneous penalties on both the Partner and Partnership firm – Matter referred to larger bench - HC

Tribunal was justified in holding that no separate penalties were warranted on the partners in addition to the penalty on the partnership firm - AT

Quick Updates: