Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2016 Year 2016 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c ) - after taking into consideration the ...

Income Tax

March 15, 2016

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c ) - after taking into consideration the human conduct and preponderance of probability clearly indicate that the assessee became a willing party to nefarious black money racket for obtaining bogus gifts. Such acts cannot be taken lightly as they lead to scourge of black money in the country. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Taxability may be decided on the basis of probable normal human conduct, surrounding circumstances, preponderance of probabilities & legal propositions - ITAT

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of interest expenditure - The findings of the AO may be sufficient to make disallowance in quantum on the theory of preponderance of...

  3. Duty demand - Clandestine removal - Revenue has prima facie proved preponderance of probability is in their favour and it is a fit case where some pre-deposit has to be...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - In case the AO concludes, that a case is made out under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, he needs to indicate, clearly, as to...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act – Inaccurate particulars furnished - different stands taken before the AO and appellate authority - assessee did not come out clean -...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has furnished bonafide and genuine explanations as to an inadvertent mistake committed by it which was an human error committed...

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - defective notice - it would be too technical and pedantic to take the view that because in the printed notice the inapplicable portion...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 on gift received - AO had discarded and doubted the genuineness of gifts on ground of human probabilities and no authority has...

  10. Levy of penalty @ 100% of the tax sought to be evaded u/s 271(1)(c) – one family giving gift to another family year after year, it can be said to be against human...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates